Title |
Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Hematology, August 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00277-008-0568-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heiner Ruschulte, Matthias Franke, Petra Gastmeier, Sebastian Zenz, Karl H. Mahr, Stefanie Buchholz, Bernd Hertenstein, Hartmut Hecker, Siegfried Piepenbrock |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Panama | 1 | <1% |
Egypt | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 19% |
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,299,636
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#129
of 2,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,052
of 82,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.