↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in a polyvalent intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in a polyvalent intensive care unit
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00134-003-1767-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Leone, Jacques Albanèse, Franck Garnier, Christophe Sapin, Karine Barrau, Marie-Christine Bimar, Claude Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Bahrain 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 7 17%
Lecturer 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,227
of 5,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,688
of 54,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.