↓ Skip to main content

Leader-Follower Equilibria for Electric Power and NO x Allowances Markets

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Management Science, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Leader-Follower Equilibria for Electric Power and NO x Allowances Markets
Published in
Computational Management Science, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10287-006-0020-1
Authors

Yihsu Chen, Benjamin F. Hobbs, Sven Leyffer, Todd S. Munson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 39%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Professor 5 12%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Computer Science 2 5%
Energy 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2007.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Computational Management Science
#9
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,730
of 64,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Management Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them