↓ Skip to main content

Use of the Spatial Scan Statistic to Identify Geographic Variations in Late Stage Colorectal Cancer in California (United States)

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Use of the Spatial Scan Statistic to Identify Geographic Variations in Late Stage Colorectal Cancer in California (United States)
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10552-005-0505-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori A. Pollack, Carol A. Gotway, Janet H. Bates, Arti Parikh-Patel, Thomas B. Richards, Laura C. Seeff, Holly Hodges, Sidibe Kassim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 39 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 30%
Researcher 10 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Mathematics 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Computer Science 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2006.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#950
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,945
of 67,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.