↓ Skip to main content

Parameterized Complexity of the Spanning Tree Congestion Problem

Overview of attention for article published in Algorithmica, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Parameterized Complexity of the Spanning Tree Congestion Problem
Published in
Algorithmica, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00453-011-9565-7
Authors

Hans L. Bodlaender, Fedor V. Fomin, Petr A. Golovach, Yota Otachi, Erik Jan van Leeuwen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Mathematics 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2010.
All research outputs
#12,878,673
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Algorithmica
#301
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,194
of 126,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithmica
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.