↓ Skip to main content

Estimated causes of death in Thailand, 2005: implications for health policy

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimated causes of death in Thailand, 2005: implications for health policy
Published in
Population Health Metrics, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1478-7954-8-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yawarat Porapakkham, Chalapati Rao, Junya Pattaraarchachai, Warangkana Polprasert, Theo Vos, Timothy Adair, Alan D Lopez

Abstract

Almost 400,000 deaths are registered each year in Thailand. Their value for public health policy and planning is greatly diminished by incomplete registration of deaths and by concerns about the quality of cause-of-death information. This arises from misclassification of specified causes of death, particularly in hospitals, as well as from extensive use of ill-defined and vague codes to attribute the underlying cause of death. Detailed investigations of a sample of deaths in and out of hospital were carried out to identify misclassification of causes and thus derive a best estimate of national mortality patterns by age, sex, and cause of death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
India 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 80 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,933,752
of 24,266,964 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#136
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,949
of 97,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,266,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.