↓ Skip to main content

Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
193 X users
facebook
21 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
614 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
883 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4665-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika Reintam Blaser, Joel Starkopf, Waleed Alhazzani, Mette M. Berger, Michael P. Casaer, Adam M. Deane, Sonja Fruhwald, Michael Hiesmayr, Carole Ichai, Stephan M. Jakob, Cecilia I. Loudet, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Juan C. Montejo González, Catherine Paugam-Burtz, Martijn Poeze, Jean-Charles Preiser, Pierre Singer, Arthur R.H. van Zanten, Jan De Waele, Julia Wendon, Jan Wernerman, Tony Whitehouse, Alexander Wilmer, Heleen M. Oudemans-van Straaten, ESICM Working Group on Gastrointestinal Function

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 193 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 883 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 879 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 112 13%
Student > Master 101 11%
Researcher 94 11%
Student > Bachelor 89 10%
Student > Postgraduate 70 8%
Other 185 21%
Unknown 232 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 389 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 135 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 2%
Unspecified 14 2%
Other 61 7%
Unknown 248 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#331,702
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#290
of 5,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,250
of 426,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.