| Title |
Prioritising islands in the United Kingdom and crown dependencies for the eradication of invasive alien vertebrates and rodent biosecurity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-017-1084-7 |
| Authors |
Andrew Stanbury, Sophie Thomas, James Aegerter, Andy Brown, David Bullock, Mark Eaton, Leigh Lock, Richard Luxmoore, Sugoto Roy, Stan Whitaker, Steffen Oppel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 52% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| Gibraltar | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,175,599
of 24,761,242 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#56
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,701
of 430,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,761,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.