↓ Skip to main content

Effect of porcine glucagon‐like peptides‐2 on tight junction in GLP‐2R + IPEC‐J2 cell through the PI3k/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K signalling pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Physiology & Animal Nutrition, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of porcine glucagon‐like peptides‐2 on tight junction in GLP‐2R + IPEC‐J2 cell through the PI3k/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K signalling pathway
Published in
Journal of Animal Physiology & Animal Nutrition, February 2017
DOI 10.1111/jpn.12644
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. K. Qi, Y. Q. Sun, J. Wan, B. Deng, X. M. Men, J. Wu, Z. W. Xu

Abstract

Because of rare glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) receptor (+) cells within the gut mucosa, the molecular mechanisms transducing the diverse actions of GLP-2 remain largely obscure. This research identified the naturally occurring intestinal cell lines that endogenously express GLP-2R and determined the molecular mechanisms of the protective effects of GLP-2-mediated tight junctions (TJ) in GLP-2R (+) cell line. (i) Immunohistochemistry results showed that GLP-2R is localised to the epithelia, laminae propriae and muscle layers of the small and large bowels of newborn piglets. (ii) GLP-2R expression was apparent in the cytoplasm of endocrine cells in IPEC-J2 cell lines. (iii) The protein expressions of ZO-1, claudin-1, occludin, p-PI3 K, p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-p70(S6K) significantly (p < 0.05) increased in GLP-2-treated IPEC-J2 cells, and all of them significantly (p < 0.05) decreased when LY-294002 or rapamycin was added. GLP-2 improves intestinal TJ expression of GLP-2R (+) cells through the PI3 k/Akt/mTOR/p70(S6K) signalling pathway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2017.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Physiology & Animal Nutrition
#652
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#366,455
of 425,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Physiology & Animal Nutrition
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.