↓ Skip to main content

Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/bf02872666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Jilcott, Alice Ammerman, Janice Sommers, Russell E. Glasgow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 238 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 21%
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Other 16 6%
Other 58 23%
Unknown 32 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 23%
Social Sciences 53 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 14%
Psychology 23 9%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 42 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#690
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,044
of 70,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.