| Title |
Components of the type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and cardiovascular responses to psychomotor performance challenge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 1978
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00846637 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theodore M. Dembroski, James M. MacDougall, Jim L. Shields, John Petitto, Robert Lushene |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 29% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 1987.
All research outputs
#5,004,361
of 23,940,110 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#322
of 1,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#593
of 5,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them