| Title |
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: effects on patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10151-016-1570-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. W. A. Koedam, G. H. van Ramshorst, C. L. Deijen, A. K. E. Elfrink, W. J. H. J. Meijerink, H. J. Bonjer, C. Sietses, J. B. Tuynman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
| Mexico | 4 | 9% |
| Italy | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 49% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 49 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,544,277
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#108
of 1,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,948
of 425,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.