| Title |
Information Uncertainty and Expected Returns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Accounting Studies, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11142-005-1528-2 |
| Authors |
Guohua Jiang, Charles M. C. Lee, Yi Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 32% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 8% |
| Professor | 20 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 91 | 38% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 65 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Review of Accounting Studies
#63
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,543
of 58,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Accounting Studies
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.