| Title |
Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration exercise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11166-007-9017-6 |
| Authors |
Laura Schechter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 73 | 45% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 26 | 16% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#182
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,327
of 69,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.