| Title |
Usefulness of Drain Amylase, Serum C‐Reactive Protein Levels and Body Temperature to Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-013-2149-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masahide Hiyoshi, Kazuo Chijiiwa, Yoshiro Fujii, Naoya Imamura, Motoaki Nagano, Jiro Ohuchida |
| Abstract |
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a worrisome and life-threatening complication. Recently, early drain removal has been recommended as a means of preventing POPF. The present study sought to determine how to distinguish clinical POPF from non-clinical POPF in the early postoperative period after PD to aid in early drain removal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,711
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,456
of 4,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,781
of 194,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.