| Title |
How Firms Respond to Business Cycles: The Role of Firm Age and Firm Size
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IMF Economic Review, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1057/imfer.2013.15 |
| Authors |
Teresa C Fort, John Haltiwanger, Ron S Jarmin, Javier Miranda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 255 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 26% |
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 20% |
| Unknown | 51 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 109 | 42% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 57 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 72 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,077,742
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#18
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,045
of 216,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them