You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tests of Financial Models in the Presence of Overlapping Observations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Financial Studies, April 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1093/rfs/4.2.227 |
| Authors |
Matthew Richardson, Tom Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 27% |
| Professor | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 35 | 45% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Review of Financial Studies
#842
of 1,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,148
of 18,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Financial Studies
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.