You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects on Vocal Fold Collision and Phonation Threshold Pressure of Resonance Tube Phonation With Tube End in Water
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0040) |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura Enflo, Johan Sundberg, Camilla Romedahl, Anita McAllister |
Abstract |
Resonance tube phonation in water (RTPW) or in air is a voice therapy method successfully used for treatment of several voice pathologies. Its effect on the voice has not been thoroughly studied. This investigation analyzes the effects of RTPW on collision and phonation threshold pressures (CTP and PTP), the lowest subglottal pressure needed for vocal fold collision and phonation, respectively. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 9% |
Professor | 9 | 9% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
Arts and Humanities | 7 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
#3,164
of 3,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,695
of 206,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.