↓ Skip to main content

Government Policies, Market Imperfections, and Foreign Direct Investment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Business Studies, March 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Government Policies, Market Imperfections, and Foreign Direct Investment
Published in
Journal of International Business Studies, March 1993
DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490227
Authors

Thomas L. Brewer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Student > Master 28 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 67 49%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 11%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Engineering 3 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Business Studies
#333
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,884
of 20,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Business Studies
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them