↓ Skip to main content

The Historical Dynamics of Social–Ecological Traps

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
The Historical Dynamics of Social–Ecological Traps
Published in
Ambio, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13280-013-0419-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wiebren J. Boonstra, Florianne W. de Boer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 28%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Master 24 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 8 4%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 67 36%
Social Sciences 25 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#17,167,893
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,774
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,657
of 210,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.