↓ Skip to main content

Autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation for non‐Hodgkin lymphoma with secondary CNS involvement

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Haematology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation for non‐Hodgkin lymphoma with secondary CNS involvement
Published in
British Journal of Haematology, July 2013
DOI 10.1111/bjh.12451
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard T. Maziarz, Zhiwei Wang, Mei‐Jie Zhang, Brian J. Bolwell, Andy I. Chen, Timothy S. Fenske, Cesar O. Freytes, Robert P. Gale, John Gibson, Brandon M. Hayes‐Lattin, Leona Holmberg, David J. Inwards, Luis M. Isola, Hanna J. Khoury, Victor A. Lewis, Dipnarine Maharaj, Reinhold Munker, Gordon L. Phillips, David A. Rizzieri, Philip A. Rowlings, Wael Saber, Prakash Satwani, Edmund K. Waller, David G. Maloney, Silvia Montoto, Ginna G. Laport, Julie M. Vose, Hillard M. Lazarus, Parameswaran N. Hari

Abstract

Pre-existing central nervous system (CNS) involvement may influence referral for autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The outcomes of 151 adult patients with NHL with prior secondary CNS involvement (CNS(+) ) receiving an AHCT were compared to 4688 patients without prior CNS lymphoma (CNS(-) ). There were significant baseline differences between the cohorts. CNS(+) patients were more likely to be younger, have lower performance scores, higher age-adjusted international prognostic index scores, more advanced disease stage at diagnosis, more aggressive histology, more sites of extranodal disease, and a shorter interval between diagnosis and AHCT. However, no statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups by analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years. A matched pair comparison of the CNS(+) group with a subset of CNS(-) patients matched on propensity score also showed no differences in outcomes. Patients with active CNS lymphoma at the time of AHCT (n = 55) had a higher relapse rate and diminished PFS and OS compared with patients whose CNS lymphoma was in remission (n = 96) at the time of AHCT. CNS(+) patients can achieve excellent long-term outcomes with AHCT. Active CNS lymphoma at transplant confers a worse prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Professor 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2013.
All research outputs
#8,191,647
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#2,994
of 7,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,310
of 199,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#18
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.