| Title |
Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-005-0060-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hogne Sandvik, Montserrat Espuna, Steinar Hunskaar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 23% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 44 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,298,516
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#320
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,572
of 93,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.