↓ Skip to main content

Social firms as a means of vocational recovery for people with mental illness: a UK survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Social firms as a means of vocational recovery for people with mental illness: a UK survey
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleanor Gilbert, Steven Marwaha, Alyssa Milton, Sonia Johnson, Nicola Morant, Nicholas Parsons, Adrian Fisher, Swaran Singh, Di Cunliffe

Abstract

Employment is associated with better quality of life and wellbeing in people with mental illness. Unemployment is associated with greater levels of psychological illnessand is viewed as a core part of the social exclusion faced by people with mental illness. Social Firms offer paid employment to people with mental illness but are under-investigated in the UK. The aims of this phase of the Social Firms A Route to Recovery (SoFARR) project were to describe the availability and spread of Social Firms across the UK, to outline the range of opportunities Social Firms offer people with severe mental illness and to understand the extent to which they are employed within these firms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 97 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Psychology 15 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,490,768
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#470
of 8,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,328
of 207,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#4
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.