You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Extended late Holocene relative sea-level histories for North Carolina, USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.01.012 |
Authors |
Andrew C. Kemp, Jessica J. Kegel, Stephen J. Culver, Donald C. Barber, David J. Mallinson, Eduardo Leorri, Christopher E. Bernhardt, Niamh Cahill, Stanley R. Riggs, Anna L. Woodson, Ryan P. Mulligan, Benjamin P. Horton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 26% |
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Professor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 47% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 19% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,699,670
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#1,273
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,139
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#17
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.