↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Patient Preference for Integrative Medical Care: Results from Patient Focus Groups

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Understanding Patient Preference for Integrative Medical Care: Results from Patient Focus Groups
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11606-007-0302-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne M. McCaffrey, Guy F. Pugh, Bonnie B. O’Connor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 111 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Psychology 11 9%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 31 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,251
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,730
of 71,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#27
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.