↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note to: Effect of dynamic cross-linking on melt rheological properties of isotactic polypropylene (iPP)/ethylene–propylene diene rubber (EPDM)/nitrile rubber (NBR) elastomeric blends

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Plastics Technology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Retraction Note to: Effect of dynamic cross-linking on melt rheological properties of isotactic polypropylene (iPP)/ethylene–propylene diene rubber (EPDM)/nitrile rubber (NBR) elastomeric blends
Published in
International Journal of Plastics Technology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12588-016-9166-z
Authors

Krishna Dutt Chauhan, R. K. Soni, Harjeet Singh

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,912,628
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Plastics Technology
#6
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,245
of 312,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Plastics Technology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them