↓ Skip to main content

A Review of the Role of Food Insecurity in Adherence to Care and Treatment Among Adult and Pediatric Populations Living with HIV and AIDS

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
Title
A Review of the Role of Food Insecurity in Adherence to Care and Treatment Among Adult and Pediatric Populations Living with HIV and AIDS
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10461-013-0547-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sera Young, Amanda C. Wheeler, Sandra I. McCoy, Sheri D. Weiser

Abstract

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is critical for reducing HIV/AIDS morbidity and mortality. Food insecurity (FI) is emerging as an important barrier to adherence to care and treatment recommendations for people living with HIV (PLHIV), but this relationship has not been comprehensively examined. Therefore, we reviewed the literature to explore how FI may impact ART adherence, retention in medical care, and adherence to health care recommendations among PLHIV. We found data to support FI as a critical barrier to adherence to ART and to other health care recommendations among HIV-infected adults, HIV-infected pregnant women and their HIV-exposed infants, and child and adolescent populations of PLHIV. Associations between FI and ART non-adherence were seen in qualitative and quantitative studies. We identified a number of mechanisms to explain how food insecurity and ART non-adherence may be causally linked, including the exacerbation of hunger or ART side effects in the absence of adequate food and competing resource demands. Interventions that address FI may improve adherence to care and treatment recommendations for PLHIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 390 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 22%
Researcher 55 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 96 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 15%
Social Sciences 54 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 5%
Psychology 17 4%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 116 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,653,817
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,050
of 3,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,128
of 197,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#21
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.