↓ Skip to main content

Direct and indirect mortality in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Direct and indirect mortality in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00484-010-0370-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan McKinney, Chris Houser, Klaus Meyer-Arendt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 29%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Environmental Science 6 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#679
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,380
of 99,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.