You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of Growth Trajectories in Classifying Fetal Growth Restriction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aog.0b013e31829ca9a7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward D. Barker, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Fiona Alderdice, Julia Unterscheider, Sean Daly, Michael P. Geary, Mairead M. Kennelly, Keelin O'Donoghue, Alyson Hunter, John J. Morrison, Gerard Burke, Patrick Dicker, Elizabeth C. Tully, Fergal D. Malone |
| Abstract |
To examine the validity of a growth trajectory method to discriminate between pathologically and constitutionally undergrown fetuses using repeated measures of estimated fetal weight. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 21 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#8,119
of 8,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,779
of 210,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#110
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.