| Title |
Isolation ofFrancisella tularensis biovarpalaearctica from human blood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01963900 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Tärnvik, C. Henning, E. Falsen, G. Sandström |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 28% |
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2007.
All research outputs
#4,736,890
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#427
of 2,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,750
of 53,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.