| Title |
Water- and airborne francisella tularensis biovar palaearctica isolated from human blood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infection, September 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01645366 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. Hoel, O. Scheel, T. Sandvik, S. H. G. Nordahl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2007.
All research outputs
#4,736,890
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#240
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,977
of 17,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them