↓ Skip to main content

Local Variation In Public Health Preparedness: Lessons From California

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local Variation In Public Health Preparedness: Lessons From California
Published in
Health Affairs, January 2004
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Lurie, Jeffrey Wasserman, Michael Stoto, Sarah Myers, Poki Namkung, Jonathan Fielding, Robert Burciaga Valdez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 26%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 29%
Social Sciences 8 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#4,850
of 6,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,622
of 133,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#40
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.