↓ Skip to main content

Safety monitoring of the coliseum technique for heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin C

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Safety monitoring of the coliseum technique for heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin C
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf02557372
Pubmed ID
Authors

O. Anthony Stuart, Arvil D. Stephens, Laura Welch, Paul H. Sugarbaker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2004.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,649
of 6,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,430
of 46,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.