| Title |
Toxicokinetics of methyl parathion and parathion in the dog after intravenous and oral administration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, September 1983
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00277817 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. A. Braeckman, F. Audenaert, J. L. Willems, F. M. Belpaire, M. G. Bogaert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,736,890
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#445
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#867
of 8,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them