↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Content Review of Children's Participation Measures Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health–Children and Youth

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Content Review of Children's Participation Measures Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health–Children and Youth
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, July 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chi-Wen Chien, Sylvia Rodger, Jodie Copley, Kelly Skorka

Abstract

To evaluate to what extent instruments that intend to measure children's participation actually do so, and to what extent their items can be classified according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth (ICF-CY).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 267 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 18%
Student > Master 49 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 46 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 21%
Psychology 21 8%
Social Sciences 21 8%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 66 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,274,808
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#938
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,020
of 207,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#12
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.