| Title |
Community-Based Prevention for Suicide in Elderly by Depression Screening and Follow-Up
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Community Mental Health Journal, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:comh.0000026998.29212.17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hirofumi Oyama, Junichi Koida, Tomoe Sakashita, Keiko Kudo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,461,297
of 25,424,630 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#253
of 1,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,800
of 62,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,424,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.