↓ Skip to main content

Biological discrimination between calcium and strontium in kidneys and bone of young and adult rats

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, March 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Biological discrimination between calcium and strontium in kidneys and bone of young and adult rats
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, March 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf02990466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Etsuko Kobayashi, Naoko Sugihira, Kazuo T. Suzuki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2004.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#473
of 2,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,031
of 17,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,032 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.