↓ Skip to main content

Strontium and bone development under conditions of suboptimal vitamin D

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified tissue research, December 1971
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Strontium and bone development under conditions of suboptimal vitamin D
Published in
Calcified tissue research, December 1971
DOI 10.1007/bf02010124
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. R. Creger, L. B. Colvin

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Calcified tissue research
#7
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#734
of 17,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified tissue research
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them