↓ Skip to main content

Utility of Amplatzer Vascular Plug with Preoperative Common Hepatic Artery Embolization for Distal Pancreatectomy with En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Utility of Amplatzer Vascular Plug with Preoperative Common Hepatic Artery Embolization for Distal Pancreatectomy with En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00270-016-1509-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masafumi Toguchi, Masakatsu Tsurusaki, Isao Numoto, Syojiro Hidaka, Miho Yamakawa, Nobuyuki Asato, SungWoon Im, Yukinobu Yagyu, Mitsuru Matsuki, Yoshifumi Takeyama, Takamichi Murakami

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP) for preoperative common hepatic embolization (CHA) before distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) to redistribute blood flow to the stomach and liver via the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Four patients (3 males, 1 female; median age 69 years) with locally advanced pancreatic body cancer underwent preoperative CHA embolization with AVP. After embolization, SMA arteriography was performed to confirm the alteration of blood flow from the SMA to the proper hepatic artery. In three of four patients, technical successes were achieved with sufficient margin from the origin of gastroduodenal artery. In one patient, the margin was less than 5 mm, although surgery was successfully performed without any problem. Eventually, all patients underwent the DP-CAR without arterial reconstruction or liver ischemia. AVP application is feasible and safe as an embolic procedure for preoperative CHA embolization of DP-CAR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 25%
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,536,217
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1,237
of 2,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,663
of 418,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#41
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,383 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.