| Title |
Optimal sedation in pediatric intensive care patients: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-2971-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nienke J. Vet, Erwin Ista, Saskia N. de Wildt, Monique van Dijk, Dick Tibboel, Matthijs de Hoog |
| Abstract |
Sedatives administered to critically ill children should be titrated to effect, because both under- and oversedation may have negative effects. We conducted a systematic review to examine reported incidences of under-, optimal, and oversedation in critically ill children receiving intensive care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#14,279,971
of 23,996,277 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,878
of 5,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,617
of 200,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#23
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,996,277 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.