You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
A defense of using resting-state fMRI as null data for estimating false positive rates
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cognitive Neuroscience, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1080/17588928.2017.1287069 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas E. Nichols, Anders Eklund, Hans Knutsson |
Abstract |
A recent Editorial by Slotnick (2017) reconsiders the findings of our paper on the accuracy of false positive rate control with cluster inference in fMRI (Eklund et al, 2016), in particular criticising our use of resting state fMRI data as a source for null data in the evaluation of task fMRI methods. We defend this use of resting fMRI data, as while there is much structure in this data, we argue it is representative of task data noise and such analysis software should be able to accommodate this noise. We also discuss a potential problem with Slotnick's own method. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 8 | 25% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
Mathematics | 3 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |