Title |
Cotransplantation of haploidentical hematopoietic and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells with a myeloablative regimen for refractory/relapsed hematologic malignancy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Hematology, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00277-013-1831-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yamei Wu, Zhihong Wang, Yongbin Cao, Lixin Xu, Xiaohong Li, Pei Liu, Pei Yan, Zhouyang Liu, Dandan Zhao, Jing Wang, Xiaoxiong Wu, Chunji Gao, Wanming Da, Zhongchao Han |
Abstract |
Human leukocyte antigen haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is associated with an increased risk of graft failure and severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been shown to support in vivo normal hematopoiesis and to display potent immunesuppressive effects. We cotransplanted the culture-expanded third-party donor-derived umbilical cord MSCs (UC-MSCs) in 50 people with refractory/relapsed hematologic malignancy undergoing haplo-HSCT with myeloablative conditioning. We observed that all patients given MSCs showed sustained hematopoietic engraftment without any adverse UC-MSC infusion-related reaction. The median times to neutrophil >0.50 × 10(9)/L and platelet >20 × 10(9)/L engraftment were 12.0 and 15.0 days, respectively. We did not observe an increase in severe acute GVHD (aGVHD) and extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD), too. Grade II-IV aGVHD was observed in 12 of 50 (24.0 %) patients. cGVHD was observed in 17 of 45 (37.7 %) patients and was extensive in 3 patients. Additionally, only five patients (10.0 %) experienced relapse at a median time to progression of 192 days. The probability that patients would attain progression-free survival at 2 years was 66.0 %. The results indicate that this new strategy is effective in improving donor engraftment and reducing severe GVHD, which will provide a feasible option for the therapy of high-risk hematologic malignancy. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 39 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
Researcher | 6 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 32% |