↓ Skip to main content

Garden Size, Householder Knowledge, and Socio-Economic Status Influence Plant and Bird Diversity at the Scale of Individual Gardens

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Garden Size, Householder Knowledge, and Socio-Economic Status Influence Plant and Bird Diversity at the Scale of Individual Gardens
Published in
Ecosystems, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9694-8
Authors

Yolanda van Heezik, Claire Freeman, Stefan Porter, Katharine J. M. Dickinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 219 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 35 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 34%
Environmental Science 68 30%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 43 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,528,733
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#1,004
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,830
of 209,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.