↓ Skip to main content

Antioxidant Therapies for Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
15 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
313 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Antioxidant Therapies for Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward D. Hall, Radhika A. Vaishnav, Ayman G. Mustafa

Abstract

Free radical-induced oxidative damage reactions, and membrane lipid peroxidation (LP), in particular, are among the best validated secondary injury mechanisms in preclinical traumatic brain injury (TBI) models. In addition to the disruption of the membrane phospholipid architecture, LP results in the formation of cytotoxic aldehyde-containing products that bind to cellular proteins and impair their normal functions. This article reviews the progress of the past three decades in regard to the preclinical discovery and attempted clinical development of antioxidant drugs designed to inhibit free radical-induced LP and its neurotoxic consequences via different mechanisms including the O(2)(*-) scavenger superoxide dismutase and the lipid peroxidation inhibitor tirilazad. In addition, various other antioxidant agents that have been shown to have efficacy in preclinical TBI models are briefly presented, such as the LP inhibitors U83836E, resveratrol, curcumin, OPC-14177, and lipoic acid; the iron chelator deferoxamine and the nitroxide-containing antioxidants, such as alpha-phenyl-tert-butyl nitrone and tempol. A relatively new antioxidant mechanistic strategy for acute TBI is aimed at the scavenging of aldehydic LP byproducts that are highly neurotoxic with "carbonyl scavenging" compounds. Finally, it is proposed that the most effective approach to interrupt posttraumatic oxidative brain damage after TBI might involve the combined treatment with mechanistically complementary antioxidants that simultaneously scavenge LP-initiating free radicals, inhibit LP propagation, and lastly remove neurotoxic LP byproducts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 201 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Master 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 45 22%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 16%
Neuroscience 32 15%
Chemistry 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 49 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,655,986
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#245
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,601
of 172,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.