↓ Skip to main content

Does the presence of sensory hypersensitivity influence outcomes of physical rehabilitation for chronic whiplash? – A preliminary RCT

Overview of attention for article published in Pain (03043959), January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the presence of sensory hypersensitivity influence outcomes of physical rehabilitation for chronic whiplash? – A preliminary RCT
Published in
Pain (03043959), January 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Jull, M. Sterling, J. Kenardy, E. Beller

Abstract

Patients with chronic whiplash associated disorders present with varied sensory, motor and psychological features. In this first instance it was questioned whether a multimodal program of physical therapies was an appropriate management to be broadly prescribed for these patients when it was known that some would have sensory features suggestive of a notable pain syndrome. A randomised controlled trial was conducted with 71 participants with persistent neck pain following a motor vehicle crash to explore this question. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either a multimodal physiotherapy program (MPT) or a self-management program (SMP) (advice and exercise). In the randomisation process, participants were stratified according to the presence or not of widespread mechanical or cold hyperalgesia. The intervention period was 10 weeks and outcomes were assessed immediately following treatment. Even with the presence of sensory hypersensitivity in 72.5% of subjects, both groups reported some relief of neck pain and disability (Neck Disability Index) and it was superior in the group receiving multimodal physiotherapy (p=0.04). Post-hoc observations however suggested that relief was marginal in the subgroup with both widespread mechanical and cold hyperalgesia. Further research is required to test the validity of this sub-group observation and to test the effect of the intervention in the long term.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 256 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 19%
Other 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Other 64 24%
Unknown 50 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 19%
Psychology 11 4%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 59 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#2,762,442
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Pain (03043959)
#1,463
of 6,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,668
of 171,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain (03043959)
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.