↓ Skip to main content

Track-weighted imaging methods: extracting information from a streamlines tractogram

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 513)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Track-weighted imaging methods: extracting information from a streamlines tractogram
Published in
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10334-017-0608-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Calamante

Abstract

A whole-brain streamlines data-set (so-called tractogram) generated from diffusion MRI provides a wealth of information regarding structural connectivity in the brain. Besides visualisation strategies, a number of post-processing approaches have been proposed to extract more detailed information from the tractogram. One such approach is based on exploiting the information contained in the tractogram to generate track-weighted (TW) images. In the track-weighted imaging (TWI) approach, a very large number of streamlines are often generated throughout the brain, and an image is then computed based on properties of the streamlines themselves (e.g. based on the number of streamlines in each voxel, or their average length), or based on the values of an associated image (e.g. a diffusion anisotropy map, a T2 map) measured at the coordinates of the streamlines. This review article describes various approaches used to generate TW images and discusses the flexible formalism that TWI provides to generate a range of images with very different contrast, as well as the super-resolution properties of the resulting images. It also explains how this approach provides a powerful means to study structural and functional connectivity simultaneously. Finally, a number of key issues for its practical implementation are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 23%
Psychology 8 13%
Engineering 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,229,033
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
#13
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,576
of 429,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them