| Title |
Native wage impacts of foreign labor: a random effects panel analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Population Economics, June 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00173618 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John P. De New, Klaus F. Zimmermann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 23 | 47% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,023,131
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Population Economics
#127
of 825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#480
of 21,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Population Economics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.