↓ Skip to main content

Canopy trees in an urban landscape – viable forests or long-lived gardens?

Overview of attention for article published in Urban Ecosystems, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Canopy trees in an urban landscape – viable forests or long-lived gardens?
Published in
Urban Ecosystems, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11252-016-0601-x
Authors

Adam C. Labatore, David J. Spiering, Daniel L. Potts, Robert J. Warren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,002,209
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Urban Ecosystems
#88
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,910
of 321,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Ecosystems
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.