↓ Skip to main content

Implications of uncertainty and scale in carbon emission estimates on locally appropriate designs to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+)

Overview of attention for article published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Implications of uncertainty and scale in carbon emission estimates on locally appropriate designs to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+)
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11027-013-9501-z
Authors

Betha Lusiana, Meine van Noordwijk, Feri Johana, Gamma Galudra, S. Suyanto, Georg Cadisch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 18%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Engineering 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#457
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,498
of 208,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.