| Title |
Expression of Desmoglein 2, Desmocollin 3 and Plakophilin 2 in Placenta and Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12015-016-9710-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie L. Hart, Elisa Rusch, Marvin Kaupp, Kay Nieselt, Wilhelm K. Aicher |
| Abstract |
Many controversial results exist when comparing mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) derived from different sources. Reasons include not only variables in tissue origin, but also methods of cell preparation or choice of expansion media which can strongly influence the expression and hence, function of the cells. In this short report we aimed to investigate the expression of the cell anchoring proteins desmoglein 2, desmocollin 3 and plakophilin 2 in early passage placenta-derived MSCs of fetal (fetal pMSCs) and maternal (maternal pMSCs) origins versus adult bone marrow-derived MSCs (bmMSCs) that were expanded and cultured under the same good manufacturing practice (GMP) conditions. Comprehensive gene expression microarray analysis profiling indicated differential expression of these genes in the different MSC-derived types with fetal pMSCs expressing the highest levels of PKP2, DSC3 and DSG2, followed by maternal pMSCs, while bmMSCs expressed the lowest levels. A higher expression of PKP2 and DSC3 genes in fetal pMSCs was confirmed by qRT-PCR suggesting neonatal increases in the expression of these desmosomal genes vs. adult MSCs. Intracellular desmocollin 3 and desmoglein 2 expression was observed by flow cytometry and cytoplasmic plakophilin 2 by immunofluorescence in all three MSC sources. These data suggest that fetal pMSCs, maternal pMSCs and bmMSCs may anchor intermediate filaments to the plasma membrane via desmocollin 3, desmoglein 2 and plakophilin 2. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 21% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#914
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,446
of 424,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.